JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 1, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Romulo Armando Rincon Rincon Vs. Eaab Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Jueces de una misma jurisdicción y del mismo distrito judicial
  • Función residual de la Corte Constitucional
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró que la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior del Distrito de Bogotá es competente para decidir sobre el conflicto de competencia de la referencia y ordenar que por Secretaría General, se envíe el expediente al citado Tribunal, toda vez que el Art. 28, inciso primero, del Código de Procedimiento Civil, contempla que los conflictos de competencia que ocurran entre juzgados de igual o diferente categoría, de distintos circuitos, pero dentro de un mismo distrito, serán resueltos por la sala civil del respectivo tribunal.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declarar que la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior del Distrito de Bogota, es competente para decidir sobre el conflicto de competencia de la referencia y ordenar que por Secretaria General, se envie el expediente al Tribunal Superior del Distrito de Bogota.
  2. Copiese, notifiquese, cumplase, publiquese e insertese en la Gaceta de la Corte Constitucional.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.